Ethnic Differences in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls Academic Article uri icon

abstract

  • Substantial evidence indicates that the experience of both clinical and experimental pain differs among ethnic groups. Specifically, African Americans generally report higher levels of clinical pain and greater sensitivity to experimentally induced pain; however, little research has examined the origins of these differences. Differences in central pain-inhibitory mechanisms may contribute to this disparity. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC), or counterirritation, is a phenomenon thought to reflect descending inhibition of pain signals. The current study assessed DNIC in 57 healthy young adults from 2 different ethnic groups: African Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Repeated assessments of the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) as well as ratings of electrical pain were obtained before, during, and after an ischemic arm pain procedure (as well as a sham procedure). The DNIC condition (ie, ischemic arm pain) produced substantial reductions in pain ratings as well as electrophysiologic measures of the NFR for all participants when compared with the sham condition (P < .001). The DNIC condition produced significantly greater reductions in verbal pain ratings among non-Hispanic whites when compared with African Americans (P = .02), whereas ethnic groups showed comparable reductions in NFR. The findings of this study suggest differences in endogenous pain inhibition between African Americans and non-Hispanic whites and that additional research to determine the mechanisms underlying these effects is warranted.

publication date

  • 2008-08-01

NIH Manuscript Submission System ID

  • NIHMS64628

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC2597628

Web of Science ID

  • 000258304900010

grantCited

  • F32 NS063624-01
  • M01 RR000082-420730
  • NS42754
  • R01 NS042754-05
  • RR00082
  • T32 MH75884

PubMed ID

  • 18482870

start page

  • 759

end page

  • 766

volume

  • 9